brand: is popular now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular now 1.00
is popular 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, is popular now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(concept, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(brand, is popular now)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(brand, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, is popular now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(brand, is popular now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)