brand: is valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable 1.00
be important to organisation 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(brand, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brand, be important to organisation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(brand, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable)