brand: need social media

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
need social media 1.00
use social media 0.97
need media 0.93
use media 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(brand, need social media)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(brand, need media)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brand, use social media)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, use media)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(brand, use social media)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(brand, use social media)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(brand, use social media)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(brand, need media)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brand, need media)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(brand, use media)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(brand, use media)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(brand, use media)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(brand, need media)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, need social media)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(brand, need social media)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(brand, need social media)