brandy: be more expensive than wine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.65
, whiskey
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, flavor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.37
, lager
Weight: 0.37
, bourbon
Weight: 0.37
, cider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than wine 1.00
be more expensive than oridinary wine 1.00
be more expensive than drinks 0.87
be more expensive than vodka 0.87
be cheaper than beer 0.86
is more expensive 0.86
be more expensive than hot drinks 0.85
be cheaper than whiskey 0.84
be better than beer 0.83
be cheaper than scotch 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(whiskey, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better than beer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better than beer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than beer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, be cheaper than scotch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cider, be cheaper than beer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cider, be better than beer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(whiskey, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(bourbon, be cheaper than scotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bourbon, be cheaper than scotch)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vodka, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than beer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cider, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cider, be better than beer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cider, be cheaper than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cider, be cheaper than beer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rum, be cheaper than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(brandy, be more expensive than wine)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than oridinary wine)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(brandy, be more expensive than oridinary wine)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than oridinary wine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brandy, be more expensive than oridinary wine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better than beer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(vodka, be better than beer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bourbon, be cheaper than scotch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cider, be better than beer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cider, be cheaper than beer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(whiskey, be more expensive than vodka)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(brandy, be more expensive than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better than beer)