brazil: is inland areas populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents argentina
Weight: 0.69
, south america
Weight: 0.65
, latin america
Weight: 0.65
, central american country
Weight: 0.64
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings uruguay
Weight: 0.49
, central america
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, north america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inland areas populated 1.00
is inland areas 0.95
is inland areas sparsely populated 0.95
is areas populated 0.91
is areas sparsely populated 0.85
is populated 0.84
is densely populated 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mexico, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(south america, is populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(south america, is populated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mexico, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(south america, is populated)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is densely populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mexico, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(south america, is populated)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(brazil, is inland areas populated)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas sparsely populated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(brazil, is inland areas sparsely populated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(brazil, is inland areas sparsely populated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(brazil, is inland areas)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(south america, is populated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mexico, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(south america, is populated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(brazil, is inland areas populated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mexico, is densely populated)