breach: be prevented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, claim
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings failure
Weight: 0.65
, hacking
Weight: 0.53
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, leak
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevented 1.00
be prevented in health care 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hacking, be prevented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be prevented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(failure, be prevented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(failure, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(failure, be prevented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(erosion, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(erosion, be prevented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hacking, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hacking, be prevented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(breach, be prevented)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented in health care)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(breach, be prevented in health care)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(breach, be prevented in health care)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(breach, be prevented in health care)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(breach, be prevented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(failure, be prevented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hacking, be prevented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(breach, be prevented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, be prevented)