breach: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, claim
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings failure
Weight: 0.65
, hacking
Weight: 0.53
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, leak
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(leak, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(erosion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(erosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(erosion, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(leak, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(leak, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(breach, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(leak, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality bad)