break: be for staff important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
, free time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings holiday
Weight: 0.65
, match point
Weight: 0.59
, interval
Weight: 0.53
, blow
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for staff important 1.00
be for staff 0.97
be important at work 0.81
be important working for time 0.78
be needed at work 0.76
is even analysis important for managers 0.76
be important working at computer for time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(break, be for staff important)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(break, be for staff)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(break, be for staff)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(break, be for staff)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(break, be important at work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(break, be important at work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(break, be for staff)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(break, be important at work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(break, be important at work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(break, be important working at computer for time)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(break, be important working at computer for time)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(break, be important working for time)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(break, be important working at computer for time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(break, be needed at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(break, be needed at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(break, be important working at computer for time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(break, be important working for time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(break, be needed at work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(break, be important working for time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(break, be needed at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(break, is even analysis important for managers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(break, be important working for time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(break, is even analysis important for managers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(break, is even analysis important for managers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(break, is even analysis important for managers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(break, be for staff important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(break, be for staff important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(break, be for staff important)