break: working at computer

Related concepts

Parents	injury Weight: 0.61 , time Weight: 0.58 , part Weight: 0.58 , free time Weight: 0.57
Siblings	holiday Weight: 0.65 , match point Weight: 0.59 , interval Weight: 0.53 , blow Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
working at computer	1.00
be important working at computer	0.97
be important working at computer for time	0.94
be important working at computer for long time	0.91
working for time	0.83
be important working	0.80
be important working for time	0.79
working for long time	0.78
work	0.76
be important working for long time	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(time, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(break, working at computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(time, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(time, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(holiday, work)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(interval, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(time, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(break, working at computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(holiday, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(holiday, work)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(interval, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(interval, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(break, working at computer)

Similarity expansion

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(break, be important working at computer)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(break, be important working at computer)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working at computer)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(break, be important working at computer for time)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(break, be important working at computer for time)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working at computer for time)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(break, be important working at computer for long time)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(break, be important working at computer for long time)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working at computer for long time)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(break, be important working at computer for time)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(break, be important working at computer)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(break, be important working at computer for long time)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(break, working for time)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(break, working for time)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(break, work)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(break, work)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(break, working for time)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(break, work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(break, be important working)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(break, be important working)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(break, working for time)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working for time)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(break, work)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(break, working for long time)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(break, be important working for time)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(break, be important working for long time)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(break, working for long time)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(break, be important working for time)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(break, be important working for long time)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(break, working for long time)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(break, be important working)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(break, be important working for long time)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(break, be important working for time)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(break, working for long time)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(break, be important working for long time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(break, working at computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(time, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(interval, work)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(holiday, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(break, working at computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(time, work)