breed: be developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.75
, golden retriever
Weight: 0.72
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.72
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.71
, thoroughbred
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed 1.00
were developed 0.94
be created 0.78
is created 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, were developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(golden retriever, were developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, were developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(breed, be developed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(breed, were developed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(breed, be created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(breed, is created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(breed, be created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(breed, is created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breed, were developed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(breed, were developed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(breed, were developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(breed, be created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(breed, is created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(breed, be created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(breed, is created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(breed, be developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(breed, be developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(breed, be developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golden retriever, were developed)