brian: be dog can talk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.60
, friend
Weight: 0.57
, child
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.35
, sarah vaughan
Weight: 0.35
, jim
Weight: 0.35
, paul
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dog can talk 1.00
is dog 0.89
talk 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(friend, talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brian, be dog can talk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(friend, talk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(friend, talk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(friend, talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(brian, be dog can talk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(brian, be dog can talk)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brian, is dog)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(brian, is dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(brian, is dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(brian, is dog)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(brian, talk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(brian, talk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(brian, talk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brian, talk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brian, be dog can talk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(friend, talk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(brian, be dog can talk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(friend, talk)