brick: be similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings wood
Weight: 0.33
, concrete
Weight: 0.33
, granite
Weight: 0.33
, linoleum
Weight: 0.33
, paneling
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar 1.00
be similar to rock 0.81
have different colours 0.79
is different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(granite, be similar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(granite, is different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(granite, be similar)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(granite, be similar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(granite, is different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(granite, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(brick, be similar)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(brick, be similar to rock)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(brick, have different colours)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar to rock)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(brick, have different colours)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brick, be similar to rock)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(brick, have different colours)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(brick, have different colours)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brick, be similar to rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(brick, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(granite, be similar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(granite, is different)