brick: be smaller than rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings wood
Weight: 0.33
, concrete
Weight: 0.33
, granite
Weight: 0.33
, linoleum
Weight: 0.33
, paneling
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smaller than rock 1.00
be smaller than metamorphic rock 0.89
be similar to rock 0.87
is rock 0.85
be similar to metamorphic rock 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(granite, is rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(granite, is rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(granite, is rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(brick, be smaller than rock)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(brick, be smaller than metamorphic rock)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(brick, be smaller than metamorphic rock)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(brick, be smaller than metamorphic rock)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(brick, is rock)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(brick, is rock)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brick, is rock)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brick, be smaller than metamorphic rock)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(brick, is rock)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar to metamorphic rock)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(brick, be similar to metamorphic rock)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(brick, be similar to metamorphic rock)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(brick, be similar to rock)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(brick, be similar to rock)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brick, be similar to rock)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(brick, be similar to metamorphic rock)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brick, be similar to rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(brick, be smaller than rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(brick, be smaller than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(granite, is rock)