bridge: be used to get across water

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.67
, project
Weight: 0.66
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
, park
Weight: 0.63
Siblings river
Weight: 0.67
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.64
, highway
Weight: 0.62
, route
Weight: 0.59
, tunnel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to get across water 1.00
be used to get across water and gap 0.85
be walk across 0.85
be build across water or canyon 0.85
be at over water 0.84
be make up of water 0.83
be used to cross over body of water 0.83
be used to cross thing water 0.82
be used to cross water 0.82
be build over water 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(river, be make up of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(river, be make up of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(river, be make up of water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bridge, be used to get across water)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be walk across)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to cross over body of water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bridge, be build across water or canyon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to cross thing water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water and gap)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bridge, be used to get across water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be used to get across water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(river, be make up of water)