bristol: be best place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents port
Weight: 0.58
, town
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, city
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.56
Siblings charleston
Weight: 0.34
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.33
, lancaster
Weight: 0.33
, birmingham
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best place live 1.00
be good place live 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(charleston, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(charleston, be good place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(birmingham, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bristol, be best place live)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bristol, be good place live)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bristol, be good place live)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(bristol, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bristol, be best place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(birmingham, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bristol, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charleston, be good place live)