broken: is sex better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents track
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, bone
Weight: 0.49
, song
Weight: 0.48
Siblings tear
Weight: 0.31
, empty set
Weight: 0.31
, wound
Weight: 0.30
, thumb
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sex better 1.00
is up sex better 0.97
is sex 0.95
is up sex 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(broken, is sex better)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(broken, is up sex better)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(broken, is up sex better)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(broken, is up sex better)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(broken, is up sex)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(broken, is up sex)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(broken, is up sex)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(broken, is sex)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(broken, is up sex better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(broken, is up sex)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(broken, is sex)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(broken, is sex)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(broken, is sex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(broken, is sex better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(broken, is sex better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(broken, is sex better)