broker: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salesperson
Weight: 0.67
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
, agent
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aon
Weight: 0.37
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, travel agent
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94
view employment 0.77
is unemployed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(financial institution, view employment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(broker, has state jobs)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(broker, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(financial institution, view employment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, view employment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(banker, jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(broker, has state jobs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(financial institution, view employment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(broker, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(travel agent, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(travel agent, has state jobs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(banker, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(banker, jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(broker, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(broker, jobs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(broker, jobs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(broker, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(broker, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(broker, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(financial institution, view employment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(banker, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(travel agent, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(broker, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(financial institution, view employment)