brooklyn: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, new york
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.65
, manhattan
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.37
, london
Weight: 0.35
, venice
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
have bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(brooklyn, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brooklyn, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(brooklyn, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brooklyn, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(brooklyn, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(brooklyn, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(brooklyn, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)