:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lover, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brother, is on)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lover, is on)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(lover, is on)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(big brother, is on)
...
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(brother, is on)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brother, is on)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lover, is on)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(brother, is on)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lover, is on)