browser: is memory hogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.87
, software
Weight: 0.75
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
, computer program
Weight: 0.61
Siblings netscape
Weight: 0.68
, lynx
Weight: 0.60
, chromium
Weight: 0.59
, epiphany
Weight: 0.50
, crawler
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
is memory hogs 1.00
use memory 0.80
take up memory 0.77
be heavy on memory 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(web browser, use memory)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(web browser, take up memory)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(browser, is memory hogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(web browser, use memory)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(web browser, take up memory)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(web browser, use memory)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web browser, take up memory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(web browser, use memory)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(web browser, take up memory)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(browser, is memory hogs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(browser, use memory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(browser, use memory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(browser, be heavy on memory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(browser, use memory)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(browser, be heavy on memory)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(browser, be heavy on memory)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(browser, be heavy on memory)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(browser, use memory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(browser, is memory hogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(web browser, use memory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(web browser, take up memory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(web browser, use memory)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(browser, is memory hogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(web browser, take up memory)