brucellosis: has state disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.66
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, vaccination
Weight: 0.47
, animal
Weight: 0.44
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.35
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, rabies
Weight: 0.35
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state disease 1.00
is notifiable disease 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(rabies, is notifiable disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(rabies, is notifiable disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rabies, is notifiable disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(brucellosis, has state disease)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(brucellosis, is notifiable disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, is notifiable disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(brucellosis, is notifiable disease)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(brucellosis, is notifiable disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(brucellosis, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brucellosis, has state disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rabies, is notifiable disease)