budget: be cheaper than uhaul

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, amendment
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.33
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than uhaul 1.00
be cheaper than avis 0.78
be cheaper than hertz 0.78
is direct cheap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(budget, be cheaper than uhaul)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than hertz)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than avis)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(budget, be cheaper than hertz)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(budget, be cheaper than hertz)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(budget, is direct cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(budget, be cheaper than avis)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(budget, be cheaper than hertz)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(budget, be cheaper than avis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(budget, be cheaper than avis)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(budget, is direct cheap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(budget, is direct cheap)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(budget, is direct cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(budget, be cheaper than uhaul)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(budget, be cheaper than uhaul) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(budget, be cheaper than uhaul)