buffalo: were important to sioux

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cape buffalo
Weight: 0.65
, water buffalo
Weight: 0.38
, bison
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, elk
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important to sioux 1.00
were important to american way 0.79
were very important for americans 0.78
were very important for americans people 0.78
were important to way 0.78
were important to american way of life 0.76
were very important for native americans people 0.75
were very important for native americans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(buffalo, were important to sioux)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(buffalo, were very important for native americans people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(buffalo, were very important for native americans people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, were very important for native americans people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(buffalo, were very important for native americans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(buffalo, were very important for native americans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(buffalo, were very important for native americans people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, were very important for native americans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(buffalo, were very important for native americans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, were important to sioux)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(buffalo, were important to sioux) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(buffalo, were important to sioux)