buffet: be used to fee large group of person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
, meal
Weight: 0.50
Siblings fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, dinner
Weight: 0.33
, breakfast
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to fee large group of person 1.00
be used to feed large amount of person 0.77
be at any large city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(buffet, be used to fee large group of person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at any large city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(restaurant, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(buffet, be used to fee large group of person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(buffet, be used to fee large group of person)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(buffet, be used to feed large amount of person)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(buffet, be used to feed large amount of person)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(buffet, be used to feed large amount of person)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to feed large amount of person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to fee large group of person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(buffet, be used to fee large group of person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(buffet, be used to fee large group of person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at any large city)