buffet: start basic income

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
start basic income 1.00
start income 0.94
pay taxes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(restaurant, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(buffet, start basic income)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(restaurant, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(restaurant, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(buffet, start basic income)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(buffet, start basic income)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(buffet, start income)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(buffet, start income)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(buffet, start income)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(buffet, start income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buffet, start basic income)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(buffet, start basic income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(buffet, start basic income)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, pay taxes)