builder: put radiators under windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, developer
Weight: 0.33
, plumber
Weight: 0.33
, engineer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
put radiators under windows 1.00
put water heaters in attic 0.83
opt for upvc windows 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(plumber, put radiators under windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(plumber, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plumber, put radiators under windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(builder, put radiators under windows)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(builder, put water heaters in attic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(builder, put water heaters in attic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(builder, put water heaters in attic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(builder, put water heaters in attic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(builder, opt for upvc windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(builder, opt for upvc windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(builder, opt for upvc windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(builder, opt for upvc windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(builder, put radiators under windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(builder, put radiators under windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(builder, put radiators under windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(plumber, put radiators under windows)