building: be earthquake proof

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be earthquake proof 1.00
is earthquake proof 1.00
be in in earthquake 0.90
be made to earthquake standard 0.88
more safe in earthquake 0.87
more safe during earthquake 0.87
fall during earthquake 0.87
resistant earthquake 0.86
be during during earthquake 0.86
was extensive in 1985 city quake 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(building, be earthquake proof)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(building, be in in earthquake)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(building, be in in earthquake)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(building, be in in earthquake)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(building, be in in earthquake)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(building, fall during earthquake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(building, fall during earthquake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(building, more safe in earthquake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(building, more safe in earthquake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(building, fall during earthquake)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(building, more safe in earthquake)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(building, fall during earthquake)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(building, more safe in earthquake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(building, be earthquake proof)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(building, be earthquake proof)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(building, be earthquake proof)