building: be erected in high arctic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be erected in high arctic 1.00
be erected in arctic 0.99
is erected 0.88
be erected on pilings 0.80
be constructed in greenland 0.79
be constructed 0.76
be constructed from ground 0.75
be constructed from ground up 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, is erected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(eiffel tower, is erected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, is erected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(building, be erected in high arctic)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(building, be erected on pilings)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(building, be erected on pilings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(building, be erected on pilings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(building, be erected on pilings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(building, be erected in high arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(building, be erected in high arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(building, be erected in high arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, is erected)