building: crack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
crack 1.00
crack on house 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(brick, crack on house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(building, crack)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(brick, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(building, crack)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(brick, crack)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(brick, crack on house)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(brick, crack)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(brick, crack on house)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(brick, crack on house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(building, crack)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(brick, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(building, crack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(building, crack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(building, crack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(building, crack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(brick, crack)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brick, crack on house)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(brick, crack)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(building, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brick, crack on house)