building: fall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall 1.00
falling over stay 0.80
grow in summer 0.78
fall down pdf 0.77
be higher in summer 0.76
be in summer 0.76
fall down during earthquake 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be higher in summer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, grow in summer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be higher in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be higher in summer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(eiffel tower, grow in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, grow in summer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be in summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(building, fall)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(building, fall down during earthquake)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(building, fall down during earthquake)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(building, fall down during earthquake)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(building, fall down during earthquake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(building, fall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, grow in summer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be higher in summer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(building, fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be in summer)