building: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality service 0.81
has shape solid 0.79
has quality shit 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
be good for building 0.76
be called solid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brick, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brick, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brick, be called solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tower, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tower, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(brick, has shape solid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(brick, be called solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(brick, be good for building)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(brick, has shape solid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(brick, be called solid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tower, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brick, be good for building)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tower, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hall, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brick, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brick, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brick, be called solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hall, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hall, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(building, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(brick, has shape solid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brick, be called solid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tower, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tower, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brick, be good for building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hall, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tower, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tower, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(brick, has shape solid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brick, be called solid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brick, be good for building)