building: lose heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose heat 1.00
be better condutor of heat 0.88
hold heat 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(brick, hold heat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(building, lose heat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(brick, be better condutor of heat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(building, lose heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(brick, be better condutor of heat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(brick, hold heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(brick, be better condutor of heat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brick, hold heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(brick, hold heat)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(building, lose heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(brick, be better condutor of heat)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(building, lose heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(building, lose heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(building, lose heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(building, lose heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(brick, be better condutor of heat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brick, hold heat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(brick, be better condutor of heat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(building, lose heat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brick, hold heat)