building: put rocks on roof

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction site
Weight: 0.75
, tower
Weight: 0.71
, brick
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apartment building
Weight: 0.74
, empire state building
Weight: 0.74
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.73
, hall
Weight: 0.73
, city hall
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
put rocks on roof 1.00
have rocks on roof 0.98
have stones on roof 0.92
have rocks 0.85
be made of rocks 0.83
have curved roofs 0.81
have roofs 0.81
have flat roofs 0.80
were in sumer made of mud bricks 0.80
have green roofs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apartment building, have flat roofs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(apartment building, have roofs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(apartment building, have roofs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(apartment building, have roofs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(apartment building, have flat roofs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(apartment building, have flat roofs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(building, put rocks on roof)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(building, were in sumer made of mud bricks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(building, were in sumer made of mud bricks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(building, were in sumer made of mud bricks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(building, were in sumer made of mud bricks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(building, put rocks on roof)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(apartment building, have roofs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(building, put rocks on roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(apartment building, have flat roofs)