bulb: be considered better than compact fluorescent ones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light bulb
Weight: 0.77
, item
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings crocus
Weight: 0.70
, tulip
Weight: 0.69
, lily
Weight: 0.61
, daffodil
Weight: 0.58
, iris
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better than compact fluorescent ones 1.00
be shaped like bulbs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bulb, be shaped like bulbs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bulb, be shaped like bulbs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bulb, be shaped like bulbs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bulb, be shaped like bulbs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bulb, be considered better than compact fluorescent ones)