bulgaria: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, european union
Weight: 0.49
, democracy
Weight: 0.48
Siblings united kingdom
Weight: 0.28
, central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, united state
Weight: 0.28
, united nations
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is poor 0.78
is poor country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(democracy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(democracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(democracy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(democracy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(democracy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(democracy, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(united nations, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(democracy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(democracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(united nations, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(united nations, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(bulgaria, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bulgaria, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bulgaria, is poor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bulgaria, is poor country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, is poor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bulgaria, is poor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bulgaria, is poor country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bulgaria, is poor country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, is poor country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(democracy, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(democracy, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(united nations, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(democracy, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(democracy, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bulgaria, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)