bulldog: were called bulldogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
, dog
Weight: 0.55
, puppy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.36
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.36
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.36
, dachshund
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were called bulldogs 1.00
be different from bulldogs 0.97
be different from english bulldogs 0.92
is dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(bulldog, were called bulldogs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, be different from bulldogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, be different from english bulldogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bulldog, is dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bulldog, be different from english bulldogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bulldog, be different from bulldogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, is dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bulldog, is dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(bulldog, be different from bulldogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bulldog, is dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bulldog, be different from bulldogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(bulldog, be different from english bulldogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bulldog, be different from english bulldogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bulldog, were called bulldogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)