bunch: be at grape in vinyard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, name
Weight: 0.54
, woman
Weight: 0.52
, stuff
Weight: 0.50
, time
Weight: 0.48
Siblings think
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.33
, crap
Weight: 0.33
, like
Weight: 0.33
, lot
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grape in vinyard 1.00
make wine 0.82
drink wine 0.79
age wine 0.78
be at different kind of fruit 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, drink wine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(woman, make wine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(time, age wine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(time, age wine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(woman, make wine)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woman, drink wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(woman, make wine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(woman, drink wine)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(time, age wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lot, be at different kind of fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(woman, make wine)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, drink wine)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(time, age wine)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lot, be at different kind of fruit)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lot, be at different kind of fruit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(time, age wine)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woman, make wine)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(woman, drink wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lot, be at different kind of fruit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(time, age wine)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woman, make wine)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bunch, be at grape in vinyard)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(woman, drink wine)