bureaucracy: is viewed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings military
Weight: 0.58
, financial institution
Weight: 0.34
, society
Weight: 0.33
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is viewed 1.00
is viewed negatively 0.86
be considered as thing 0.77
be considered thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is viewed negatively)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed negatively)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed negatively)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed negatively)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is viewed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bureaucracy, is viewed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is viewed)