burglar: break up on grill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.56
, thief
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, criminal
Weight: 0.52
, alarm
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rapist
Weight: 0.33
, robber
Weight: 0.32
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.32
, suspect
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
break up on grill 1.00
break into houses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(burglar, break up on grill)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(burglar, break into houses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(burglar, break into houses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burglar, break into houses)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(burglar, break into houses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(burglar, break up on grill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(burglar, break up on grill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(burglar, break up on grill)