burning: be of plastics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be of plastics 1.00
is chemical 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is chemical)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(explosion, is chemical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(explosion, is chemical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(burning, be of plastics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(burning, be of plastics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, be of plastics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(explosion, is chemical)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(burning, be of plastics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical)