burning: cause air pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause air pollution 1.00
pollute water air 0.88
pollute air 0.87
produce pollutants 0.84
produce similar pollutants 0.83
contribute to smog 0.83
affect air 0.83
add to amount of carbon dioxide in air 0.82
pollute environment 0.80
pollute land 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(activity, contribute to smog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(burning, cause air pollution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(burning, cause air pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(activity, contribute to smog)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(activity, contribute to smog)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(combustion, affect air)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(activity, contribute to smog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(burning, cause air pollution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(burning, cause air pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(combustion, affect air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(combustion, affect air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(burning, cause air pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(burning, produce pollutants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(burning, produce pollutants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(burning, produce pollutants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, produce similar pollutants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(burning, produce pollutants)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(burning, cause air pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to smog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(combustion, affect air)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(activity, add to amount of carbon dioxide in air)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(burning, cause air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(activity, contribute to smog)