burning: kind of fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
kind of fuel 1.00
is fuel 0.91
is fuels 0.81
fossil fuels in power stations 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(combustion, is fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(combustion, is fuel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(burning, kind of fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(burning, is fuels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(burning, is fuels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(burning, fossil fuels in power stations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(burning, fossil fuels in power stations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(burning, is fuels)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(burning, fossil fuels in power stations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, fossil fuels in power stations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(burning, is fuels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(burning, kind of fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(burning, kind of fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(burning, kind of fuel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(combustion, is fuel)