burundi: poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.53
, nation
Weight: 0.42
, example
Weight: 0.39
, market
Weight: 0.37
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.27
, czech republic
Weight: 0.27
, city hall
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
poor 1.00
is poor 0.99
is poor country 0.92
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(burundi, poor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(burundi, poor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(burundi, poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(market, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(czech republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(central american country, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burundi, poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burundi, poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burundi, poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(central american country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(central american country, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(czech republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(czech republic, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(burundi, poor)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(burundi, is poor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(burundi, is poor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(burundi, is poor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(burundi, is poor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(burundi, is poor country)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(burundi, poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(czech republic, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central american country, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(burundi, poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)