bus: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school bus
Weight: 0.90
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, police car
Weight: 0.60
Siblings taxi
Weight: 0.62
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.36
, van
Weight: 0.36
, station wagon
Weight: 0.36
, truck
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
get to london 0.99
stops in london 0.89
be expensive in rome 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(taxi, be expensive in rome)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(taxi, be expensive in rome)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxi, be expensive in rome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bus, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bus, get to london)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bus, get to london)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bus, get to london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(bus, stops in london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bus, stops in london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bus, stops in london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(bus, get to london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bus, stops in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bus, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bus, be in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bus, be in london)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(taxi, be expensive in rome)