butler: be used to answer door

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents servant
Weight: 0.67
, man
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.58
, player
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, maid
Weight: 0.34
, postman
Weight: 0.34
, prince
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to answer door 1.00
be at front door 0.84
enter door 0.84
force open door 0.83
pull at door 0.81
press suspect for answer 0.81
see date to her door 0.80
wedge door open 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(man, enter door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(butler, be used to answer door)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(man, enter door)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(man, enter door)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at front door)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(policeman, force open door)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(policeman, press suspect for answer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(man, enter door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(butler, be used to answer door)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(policeman, press suspect for answer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(policeman, press suspect for answer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(policeman, be at front door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at front door)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(policeman, force open door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(policeman, force open door)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(butler, be used to answer door)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(butler, be used to answer door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(man, enter door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policeman, force open door)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(policeman, press suspect for answer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(policeman, be at front door)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(butler, be used to answer door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(man, enter door)