buy: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, sell
Weight: 0.51
, purchase
Weight: 0.51
, trade
Weight: 0.50
, store
Weight: 0.49
Siblings buying
Weight: 0.35
, hire
Weight: 0.31
, street sign
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
is wrong price 0.86
price disappear 0.81
is over priced 0.80
is priced 0.79
has quality better 0.79
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hire, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(buying, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hire, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hire, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(buying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(buy, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(buy, is wrong price)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(buy, price disappear)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(buy, price disappear)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(buy, price disappear)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(buy, is wrong price)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buy, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hire, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(buying, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(buying, has quality better)