buyer: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.54
Siblings china
Weight: 0.62
, salesperson
Weight: 0.35
, seller
Weight: 0.35
, tenant
Weight: 0.34
, investor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(buyer, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(buyer, jobs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(buyer, jobs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(buyer, jobs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(buyer, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(buyer, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buyer, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(buyer, has state jobs)