buying: be frowned upon illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, crime
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, contract
Weight: 0.54
Siblings buy
Weight: 0.35
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, shopping
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be frowned upon illegal 1.00
is illegal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(eating, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(eating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(eating, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(buying, be frowned upon illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buying, is illegal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(buying, is illegal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(buying, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(buying, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(buying, be frowned upon illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(buying, be frowned upon illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(buying, be frowned upon illegal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(eating, is illegal)