buying: is healthier

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, crime
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, contract
Weight: 0.54
Siblings buy
Weight: 0.35
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, shopping
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is healthier 1.00
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(buy, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(buy, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(buying, is healthier)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(buying, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(buying, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(buying, is healthier)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(buying, is healthier)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(buying, is healthier) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(buy, has quality better)