c sharp: be better than java

Related concepts

Parents	programming language Weight: 0.54 , language Weight: 0.50
Siblings	perl Weight: 0.31 , f word Weight: 0.30 , smalltalk Weight: 0.30 , css Weight: 0.30 , pascal Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than java	1.00
be called java	0.91
be better than html	0.76
be faster than xpath	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(programming language, be called java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(c sharp, be better than java)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(programming language, be called java)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(programming language, be called java)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(css, be faster than xpath)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(css, be better than html)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(programming language, be called java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(c sharp, be better than java)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(css, be better than html) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(css, be better than html)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(css, be faster than xpath) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(css, be faster than xpath)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(c sharp, be better than java)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(c sharp, be better than java)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(programming language, be called java)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(css, be better than html)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(css, be faster than xpath)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(c sharp, be better than java) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(programming language, be called java)